What\u2019s that, you ask? Look at the title of this post: it\u2019s the second comma after the word \u2018Controversy.\u2019 In any list of three or more items, the Oxford comma is the comma placed after the second-to-last item. It got its name because if you publish with the Oxford University Press, you have to use it.<\/p>\n
The Oxford comma can be very important because without it, your meaning can get lost. Consider this sentence:<\/p>\n
\u201cI keep scrapbooks of my children, Bob Dylan, and Beyonce.\u201d<\/p>\n
See the Oxford comma after \u2018Bob Dylan\u2019? That makes it clear that I keep three scrapbooks; two of my musical idols, and one of my children. Now try that sentence without the Oxford comma:<\/p>\n
\u201cI keep scrapbooks of my children, Bob Dylan and Beyonce.\u201d<\/p>\n
This sentence either implies that Bob Dylan and Beyonce are my children (sadly, my genes just aren\u2019t that musical), or that I named my children Bob Dylan and Beyonce (not a bad idea, but not true). Either way, the sentence loses its precise meaning.<\/p>\n
So the Oxford comma can definitely be helpful. But it is highly controversial. Opponents argue that, for most sentences, the Oxford comma simply slows down your reading without adding anything. Simple lists like \u201csandwiches, cakes and drinks\u201d make perfect sense without the Oxford comma. In these cases, adding the Oxford comma could just take up space and slow down the flow of the writing.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s not often that grammar nerds disagree so fundamentally on a particular principle. The pro-Oxford comma camp fights for precision; the anti- camp fights for economy. Their arguments have been dubbed \u2018the Oxford comma wars,\u2019 and like many modern skirmishes, this one is fought largely through internet memes.<\/p>\n
![\"no7pL\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thesislink.aut.ac.nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/no7pL.jpg?ssl=1\")
<\/a><\/p>\n